|
We were
deeply saddened to learn about the
death of 2-year-old Shaiunna Hare,
who was killed in her home in
Oxford, Florida, Wednesday
morning.
There are
still some significant questions
about whether the family’s 8-foot
Burmese Python really killed the
child, or whether she died
beforehand and the snake was
tossed into her crib to take the
blame. We are all waiting for the
autopsy reports to be issued. We
hope that the coroner will review
all the evidence fairly, and reach
the proper conclusions, without
allowing any personal prejudices
to cloud his/her judgment.
Regardless
of how it happened, her death is a
terrible tragedy. However, it is
already clear that her parents are
guilty of gross negligence and
breaking several laws, and should
be held legally accountable for
her untimely death.
1) The
python was being kept illegally;
it was not properly microchipped
or licensed in accordance with
Florida State Laws.
2) The
python was not being properly
housed. Its habitat was
dangerously small and insecure.
Instead of using any kind of lid,
the parents were merely laying a
quilt over the top of the cage,
and securing the corners with a
rope. Their own statement to
police indicated that the python
had already escaped once the
previous night, yet they had taken
no additional steps to ensure that
it remained safely caged.
3) It
appears that the python was being
systematically starved. It was
very thin, and there is
considerable question about when
it was last fed.
Under these
appalling conditions, the
surprising fact is not that a
tragedy occurred, but that it
didn’t happen much sooner.
Florida Fish
& Wildlife and the Florida Reptile
Community have established strict
guidelines for the ownership of
Burmese Pythons. The laws already
in place in Florida are strong. Had they been followed, this
tragedy could have been prevented.
Our hearts
go out to the family, as they must
be struggling with a huge amount
of sorrow and guilt right now. Our
hearts also go out to the python
who, by all accounts, was NOT
normally aggressive but was
severely starved, and allegedly desperate
enough to attack a "prey" that
tasted bad (human flesh has a
distinctly bitter tang to it,
which is why most predators will
not attack a human unless starving
or threatened).
But mostly our
hearts go out to the defenseless
little girl who was killed. Thanks
to all the fatal mistakes made by
her parents, she will never see
another butterfly or sunrise or
smiling face again.
Addendum - 8/1/2009
A few more facts to consider
about this tragic incident:
- The snake was clearly
not aggressive, as the child had
played with it on the floor
regularly, and it had never made
the slightest attempt to menace
her, even though it had been
systematically starved for
possibly years.
- No snake will attack, or
attempt to eat, any prey that is
too large to fit down its
throat. Even a healthy
8-foot Burmese Python would have
considerable difficulty
swallowing a two-year-old child.
The
snake in question could never
even have gotten its mouth
around the girl's head, let
alone her shoulders.
-
DCF had already been called out
to the house on previous
occasions, because the children
were not being properly cared
for.
- The mother and boyfriend
noticed that the snake was
missing from its tank again
before they noticed that the
child didn't appear for
breakfast--am I the only one who
sees something wrong with that
picture??
- The mother's boyfriend
claims that the snake was
wrapped around the child's neck,
yet the coroner's report
indicates that her ribs were
broken. This is the same
boyfriend whose own daughter died at the same age, a few years
ago, under suspicious circumstances.
- The child's grandmother
(the mother's mother) has
expressed grave concerns that
the child might have already
been dead, and the snake was put
in her crib to cover up her
death.
- Experts in the
herpetological field agree that
there are just too many facts
that "don't add up," and
suspicions about whether the
child died of an accident or
misadventure continue to grow.
- Certain segments of the
media have been claiming that
the snake was being kept in a
tank with a secured lid and a
lock, and that it broke through
the lock. This is NOT
true.
- These same media venues
are the same ones supporting
H.R. 669, S. 373, and its
companion Bill H.R. 2811, which
would outlaw all "non-native"
pets throughout the United
States. |